1. Melissa Maclean was granted free and totally unrestricted access to Kenja activities – nothing was withheld from her.
    
2. She also was granted complete access to Ken and Jan and she must have at least 20-30 hours of interview footage with Ken and Jan. 
    
3. She gave her word to Ken that the documentary would be fair and balanced, and that she would not engage in the tabloid, sensationalist sort of propaganda that is in the film. It was under these conditions that she was granted access to Kenja, Ken and Jan.
     
4. She gave her word to over 100 Kenja participants that the documentary would be fair and balanced. She claimed to be researching ‘new spiritual movements’ and that she had intended to go to America but was fascinated by this home-grown product. She indicated that there would be other groups covered in the documentary as well. She gave her word to these people that she would let them see it for comment before it was finalised in documentary form.
    
   She did not keep any of these promises.
    
5. Melissa Maclean did not let us know that she was talking to former Kenja participants, so there was no opportunity for right of reply to these people.
    
6. The first negative person seen attacking Kenja is Annette Stephens. In late 1991 we asked her to cease participating in Kenja activities. We had had ongoing clashes with Annette over her unethical behaviour. She was also bitter and angry that we had not allowed her to begin a Kenja centre of her own. She was to later state that she had been "deprogrammed".
    
   Deprogramming is an activity which emerged in America which at that time involved the forcible kidnapping of an individual, imprisoning them and subjecting them to mental and sometimes physical assault in order to change the belief system of this individual back to the belief system of the hirers of the deprogrammers. For example, in the 1970s and 1980s in America some families availed themselves of this deprogramming service, horrified that loved ones had turned their back on the family religion and were embracing a new one. This practice was finally outlawed in America, and the American organisation that acted as a referral system for deprogramming "Cult Awareness Network" was bankrupted after a million-dollar payout was awarded to a young man who had been deprogrammed before he sued and won his case against the deprogrammer Rick Ross, and Cult Awareness Network for acting as a referral organisation for deprogramming.
    
   After therapy, including hypnotism, by "exit-counsellors" (the new name given to deprogramming), Annette Stephens became the face of an Anti-Cult movement attack on Ken, Jan and Kenja.
    
   She joined forces with an Australian ex-politician Stephen Mutch who had strong personal connections with a woman associated with the English equivalent of Cult Awareness Network. Stephens publicly stated she intended to bring Cult Awareness Network to Australia. She did this, and in association with Stephen Mutch and the other woman Marea Capell began initial attempts to sue Ken, Jan and Kenja for "brainwashing". She stands to make thousands of dollars through this personal enterprise.
    
   So the attack on Ken, Jan and Kenja began. For Annette, this included attempted civil action, newspaper attacks, tabloid sensationalist television attacks. All of these attacks failed. It was only after the suicide of a young man Michael Beaver and subsequent false claims that Kenja was responsible, that their attack got off the ground.
    
7. The truth was, Michael had been deprogrammed (2 years after leaving Kenja, on good terms). Despite police exonerating any implication of Kenja in his suicide, Annette Stephens and Stephen Mutch and Michael’s mother Wendy Beaver, ruthlessly attempted to use Michael’s death to get more negative press on Ken, Jan and Kenja. When this failed, Annette Stephens began to canvass a close friend of hers, who had 3 daughters. All of them had been present at the deprogramming of Michael Beaver. After this, Annette was able to get one of the girls from this family and her best friend (the girls' mothers were also best friends) to falsely bring child molestation accusations against Ken. The girls were 17 and 18 at this time. After their association with Mutch and Stephens, the 3 sisters and other best friend were eventually to bring charges against Ken. These were the initial charges - prompted by Annette Stephens and assisted by Wendy Beaver, in 1993. Ken eventually successfully defended himself against every single charge. 
    
8. There is a concerted attempt to confuse you at the end of Melissa's film. However, here are the facts about that first court case: Ken was charged on 11 counts of child molestation. He was found not guilty on 10 of them and in a separate trial he was initially found guilty of kissing a girl on the forehead. In the trial, the prosecution had wanted to drop the case, because the complainant "did not come up to proof". This means she did not in her evidence, accuse Ken of what she had originally told the police. And also the prosecution admitted there were "glaring inconsistencies" between the evidence of the girl and her mother.
    
   On appeal to the High Court of Australia, this conviction was quashed, the High Court stating that the judge in a lower court had misdirected the jury to find Ken guilty. 
    
9. The type of allegations and sexual innuendo you will hear Annette Stephens, Adrian Norman and Jenny Hodges make, were all aired during the 1993 court proceedings against Ken - a thinly disguised attack against Kenja. These people and their allegations were discredited and documented proof from this trial indicates quite clearly the conspiracy between Stephens, Mutch and other protagonists in association with the girls. (This documentary proof forms the basis of our highly successful lecture touring Australia at the moment, "Guilty until Proven Innocent").
    
   The gradual increasing sexual frenzy that takes over Melissa's film is heightened by very old footage of interviews of women canvassed by Annette Stephens, appearing in tabloid TV current affairs programs, which were part of the 1992 attack and made before and as a lead up to the court case.
10. Jenny Hodges
    Jenny Hodges was asked to leave Kenja in the late 1980s. She had a very sad history of drug abuse, "exotic dancing" and was renowned for the sexual fantasy worlds she lived in, along with her attempts to engage with many men.
11. Adrian Norman
    A young man in the mid-1980s, he held a position at a Kenja centre but was asked to step down due to inappropriate sexual behaviour with female clients. 
12. The black silhouetted figure in the film is a known ex-Kenja participant who was asked to leave in 2002, after inappropriate behaviour with his daughter. He was a self-confessed wipe-out with drug and alcohol problems, when he first met Ken in the early 1980s. He publicly attributed Ken as the source of the help he received, which pulled him back from the brink of death. Just prior to being asked to leave Kenja activities, this man had been suspected of money laundering and subsequently lost a major business deal. He is actively involved with activities to destroy Kenja to this very day.

Back